answer:Step 1: Identify the language of the text. The text is in French. Step 2: Begin translating the text by breaking it down into smaller parts and understanding its meaning. "La sciure de bois" - wood sawdust "et les déchets de copeaux des scieries" - and waste shavings from sawmills "servent dorénavant" - now serve "à la production d'une nouvelle source de chaleur et d'énergie" - for the production of a new heat and energy source "les pastilles de bois" - wood pellets Step 3: Put the translated parts together to form a coherent sentence in English. The wood sawdust and waste shavings from sawmills now serve for the production of a new heat and energy source: wood pellets.

answer:Step 1: Analyze the given information - Carson pulled the football away and threw it somewhere far. - The answer to a question is "get away from football". Step 2: Identify the relationship between the given information and the answer. - There seems to be a common theme of avoiding or distancing oneself from the football. Step 3: Formulate a question that has the answer "get away from football". - Considering the context, a possible question could be: Question: What should someone do if they want to avoid getting hit by the football that Carson threw?

answer:"Spring into action" First, let's break down the question and evaluate each possible answer based on the context. The question states that the person knew what he had to do to achieve his dreams. This sentence implies that the person has a clear vision of their goals and an understanding of the necessary steps to accomplish them. With this in mind, let's examine each possible answer: 1. Spring into action: This option means that the person immediately started taking proactive steps towards achieving their dreams. Since the person knew what needed to be done, it makes sense that they would waste no time in pursuing their goals. This fits the context perfectly and appears to be the most likely correct answer. 2. Accept his fate: This choice implies that the person willingly chose to resign themselves to their situation, which contradicts the context of the question. A person who knows what they need to do to achieve their dreams would be more likely to take action instead of merely accepting their current circumstances. 3. Cross street: This response is vague and unrelated to the context of the question. We have no information about whether crossing a street would be relevant to achieving the person's dreams, so we can't consider this as the correct answer. 4. Feel upset: While this option might be a possible reaction, it doesn't align with the context of the question. Feeling upset doesn't necessarily contribute to achieving one's dreams or indicate that the person is actively working towards their goals. Additionally, knowing what to do to realize one's dreams should generally be a motivating factor, rather than a source of distress. 5. Travel to Europe: Though it is possible that travel could play a role in achieving the person's dreams, this answer is too specific and situational. It assumes that going to Europe is absolutely necessary for the person's aspirations, which is not mentioned or implied in the question. Considering all the options and analyzing their relevance to the question, the most suitable answer is "spring into action." This choice aligns with the context and shows a proactive approach taken by the person who knows what they have to do to achieve their dreams.

answer:Step 1: Identify the core message of both sentences In both sentences, the core message is that the diminutive form of the word "Caipirinha" is globally known as a cocktail. Step 2: Comparing the sentence structures Sentence 1: The diminutive form of the word `` Caipirinha '' is known worldwide as a cocktail. Structure: The diminutive form (subject) + is known worldwide (predicate) + as a cocktail (object). Sentence 2: The diminutive form of the word `` caipirinha '' , is worldwide-known as a cocktail well. Structure: The diminutive form (subject) + is worldwide-known (predicate) + as a cocktail (object) + well (modifier). Step 3: Examine the differences in structures and word choices Sentence 2 has an additional word "well". This word doesn't change the core meaning, but its placement seems incorrect and doesn't add any value to the sentence. Also, there is an extra comma in Sentence 2 which is unnecessary and makes the sentence structure awkward. Step 4: Conclusion Considering the overall meaning and the core message in both sentences appears to be the same, we can say that the sentences have the same meaning, although sentence 2 has an awkward structure and unnecessary word placement.