Skip to content
🤔prompts chat🧠
🔍
question:I picked up this Sporf in Amsterdam Schipol airport. A spork I'd seen before, but the addition of a simple serration on the side of the fork end makes this a genuine "three-in-one" implement for eating one's full three-course takeaway meal on the plane. The sporf is no innovation; back in 1940 the "sporf" was born. It took me until 2015 to notice this one thanks to its rather pleasant design. The sporf is a little like most strategy documents that I come across. It is one implement designed to serve a multitude of goals, but with one fatal flaw: you can only ever use one part of the sporf / strategy at any one time. With the sporf, things would get messy trying to use the spoon and knife and the same time. The knife and fork work quite well in sequence but physics prevents me using both at the same time as I can with the older technologies of knife and fork. In strategy formation, we can develop a multitude of potential purposes within one document, killer vision statement or mission. But it's important to recognise that the teams around us will only ever be able to do one thing really well at any one time. This is a lesson oft ignored by schools, in particular, as they attempt to ask educators to create an ever-more creative curriculum without having first tackled attitudes towards summative assessments throughout the year. It is also a challenge in some of the world's most successful, but now stagnating, big businesses: they've spent decades or centuries building a reputation across a large array of devices, technologies, components or clothing, but the real strategy is working out which of the current array needs killed off to enable teams in their quest to develop something totally new, properly innovative. Question: What is the author's hobby Options: A. traveling B. using sporfs C. not enough information D. strategy formation === The correct answer is Answer:

answer:C. not enough information

question:Write the next sentence. I replaced my old wood garden shed in the backyard with a concrete one. The OPTIONS: a). concrete was sturdy.; b). wood was sturdy.;

answer:a). concrete was sturdy. To write the next sentence, I will choose option "a" as it follows the logic of replacing the old wood garden shed with a concrete one, thereby emphasizing the improvement in sturdiness.

question:Generate a sentence about this data: Elliot See, almaMater, University of Texas at Austin; University of Texas at Austin, affiliation, University of Texas System; University of Texas at Austin, competeIn, Big 12 Conference. Sentence:

answer:Elliot See, an alumnus of the University of Texas at Austin, which is affiliated with the University of Texas System, actively participated in the competitive Big 12 Conference during his time there.

question:Only 12 of the last 30 attempts to reach Mars have succeeded ( two are in transit ) . Of about 30 attempts to reach Mars , only 12 missions have succeeded . Please tell me if the sentences above mean the same. Select from: (1). no (2). yes

answer:(2). yes Both sentences convey the same information, although they are phrased differently. The key elements that are present in both sentences are: 1. The total number of attempts to reach Mars: approximately 30. 2. The number of successful missions: 12. 3. Acknowledgment of the two missions that are currently in transit. The first sentence is structured as follows: - It begins by stating the number of successful missions (12) and the total number of attempts (30) in a comparative format. - The information about the two missions in transit is provided within parentheses. The second sentence structure is as follows: - It starts with the total number of attempts (about 30) and later states the number of successful missions (12). - A comma separates the primary information from the additional detail about the two missions in transit. Despite the differences in phrasing and sentence structure, the meaning and content of both sentences are the same. Both sentences emphasize the success rate of reaching Mars and provide supplementary information about the missions that are presently en route to the Red Planet.

Released under the Anthropic License.

has loaded