Skip to content
🤔prompts chat🧠
🔍
question:In one sentence, describe what the following article is about: Write the first name of the author and then the last name, followed by a comma. The style illustrated here is for footnotes and endnotes. Bibliography citations are addressed later in this method. For example: Max Smith, If you have multiple authors, list them alphabetically by last name using the same format. Separate each name with a comma, and use the word “and” before the final name. For example: Max Smith, James Yank, and Krista Zee, Format the article title using an open quotation mark, the title, a comma, and then a closed quotation mark. Put the title of the piece in title case. For example: Max Smith, “Why Geopolitics Matters,” Put the name of the publication in title case and follow it with a comma. For example: Max Smith, “Why Geopolitics Matters,” The American Conservative, Write the full name of the month, the day of the month, a comma, and then the year, followed by another comma. For example: Max Smith, “Why Geopolitics Matters,” The American Conservative, May 6, 2015, Write the page number as a numeral or range of numerals followed by a period. So, “[first/only page]-[last page].” For example, to cite one page: Max Smith, “Why Geopolitics Matters,” The American Conservative, May 6, 2015, 32. Or, to cite a range of pages: Max Smith, “Why Geopolitics Matters,” The American Conservative, May 6, 2015, 32-35. Unless you accessed the article online or in a database, this is the full citation. If you found your magazine article online or in an academic database, write that information after the article’s publication date. To accommodate the new information, the period following the date becomes a comma instead. Write the URL or database, and then add a period at the end of the citation. For example, in the case of a URL: Max Smith, “Why Geopolitics Matters,” The American Conservative, May 6, 2015, 32, http://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/why-geopolitics-matters/. Or, in the case of a database: Max Smith, “Why Geopolitics Matters,” The American Conservative, May 6, 2015, 32, LexisNexis Academic. Chicago and Turabian only ask that you include either the URL or the database. You do not need to include both if you found the article in an academic database. If you’re creating a bibliography, write the last name of the author, a comma, the first name, and then a period. The rest of the citation flows the same as a footnote or endnote.For example: Smith, Max. “Why Geopolitics Matters,” The American Conservative, May 6, 2015, 32. Summary:

answer:The article provides a step-by-step guide on how to cite magazine articles using the Chicago and Turabian citation styles, including author names, article title, publication details, and online or database sources.

question:Maps is the debut release by Ohio/Detroit-based pop punk band Mixtapes. The album was recorded over one weekend and released for free on Death to False Hope Records. It was later re-released in November 2011 on vinyl via Animal Style Records, featuring the 10 songs from "Maps "and a newly recorded EP titled "Companions". The album was re-titled "Maps & Companions". Choose your answer: based on the paragraph above can we conclude that "Maps comprised 10 songs."? Select from: A). Yes; B). It's impossible to say; C). No; I think the answer is

answer:A). Yes;

question:What is the sentiment of the following tweet? Tweet:@AshleyLTMSYF i missing you every day! have a good day angel and have some fan!!!

answer:The sentiment of the tweet is positive and happy. The person who wrote it is saying they miss Ashley and hopes she has a great day full of fun. They also call Ashley an "angel," which is a very nice and sweet thing to say.

question:How does the sentence end? The show was a lot more wonderful than the cartoon because the (A). show was very imaginative.; (B). cartoon was very imaginative.;

answer:To determine the correct ending for the given sentence, let's analyze the context and the options provided. The sentence states: "The show was a lot more wonderful than the cartoon because the..." The context implies that we're comparing two things here: the show and the cartoon. We're trying to justify why the show was more wonderful than the cartoon. Therefore, we need to either emphasize a positive aspect about the show or point out a negative aspect about the cartoon to justify the comparison. Option (A): "show was very imaginative." Option (B): "cartoon was very imaginative." Since option (A) highlights a positive aspect of the show, it supports the initial claim that the show was more wonderful than the cartoon. On the other hand, option (B) emphasizes a positive aspect of the cartoon. If the cartoon were imaginative it wouldn't strengthen the statement that the show was more wonderful. So, the sentence ends as: The show was a lot more wonderful than the cartoon because the show was very imaginative.

Released under the Anthropic License.

has loaded