answer:Title: David Beckham Denies Under Oath Having Sex With Prostitute Introduction In a recent legal battle, David Beckham, the iconic former English footballer, and renowned fashion icon, has vehemently denied allegations made about him having sexual relations with a prostitute. Beckham appeared in court to testify under oath, and his reactions were a mix of indignation, frustration, and denial as he addressed the accusations head-on. This article explores the background of the allegations, the reasons behind Beckham's decision to take legal action, and the potential impact on his globally recognized brand and reputation. Background of the Allegations The allegations against Beckham first surfaced in 2010 when a tabloid newspaper published a story claiming that he had slept with a high-end escort by the name of Irma Nici. According to the story, Beckham had engaged in sexual relations with Nici on at least two occasions. The striking account, filled with lurid detail, captured worldwide attention and threatened to tarnish the reputation of the beloved celebrity. In response to the explosive story, Beckham immediately and categorically denied ever meeting Nici or engaging in any form of sexual relations with her. He accused the tabloid of fabricating the story, arguing that the claims were both baseless and malicious. Taking Legal Action Beckham, known for fiercely guarding his reputation and family life, filed a lawsuit against the tabloid in question for libel and slander. He sought damages and an injunction that would require the publication to retract the allegations, which his lawyers characterized as false, inflammatory, and defamatory. The court, after reviewing the case, granted Beckham a preliminary injunction. While the injunction did not resolve the issue entirely, it served as a warning shot to the media worldwide as it prevented the republication of the allegations in the United States and other jurisdictions. Denying the Allegations Under Oath In the course of the legal proceedings, Beckham was called to testify under oath. Appearing before the court, Beckham vehemently denied having any involvement with Nici, let alone having sexual relations with her. He emphasized that his family was of the utmost importance to him and such allegations not only damaged his reputation but also threatened the sanctity of his marriage and family life. Throughout his testimony, Beckham remained steadfast in his denial of the accusations, delving into the details of the story and refuting each point. His frustration and defiance in the face of the allegations were palpable, as he seemed determined to fight tooth and nail for the truth and his reputation. Impact on Beckham's Brand and Reputation Beckham's global brand has been built on a foundation of sporting excellence, fashion influence, and wholesome family values. The allegations of infidelity threatened to erode the carefully cultivated image of a devoted husband and family man that he has maintained over the years. However, by taking decisive legal action and testifying under oath, Beckham demonstrated his firmness in defending his name and refuting any falsehoods attributed to him. By standing up and declaring the truth under oath, Beckham effectively controlled the narrative - that he is an innocent party and victim of false accusations. Conclusion The case surrounding David Beckham and the allegations of having sex with a prostitute underscore the vulnerability of celebrities to scandal and the importance of maintaining one's reputation. By vigorously denying the allegations under oath, Beckham ensured that the narrative of his innocence overrode the tabloid's sensational claims. Regardless of the outcome of the case, the facts are clear: Beckham is not shying away from the fight, determined to protect his image and clear his name from these baseless accusations.

answer:Based on the given text, there is no information provided about Jay McInerney's intentions for his book. Hence, we cannot determine whether the sentence "Jay never intended the book to be made into a movie" is true or not. The text only mentions that the song "Kiss and Tell" appears in the film "Bright Lights, Big City," which is adapted from Jay McInerney's novel.

answer:The hypothesis is not entailed by the premise. The premise talks about women at a marketplace or an Asian food court, while the hypothesis mentions women arriving home from work. These are two different scenarios, so the answer is "no."

answer:No