answer:No, "Juande Ramos" is not the correct answer to the question "While being an excellent professional who could not get a response out of the team?" based on the given text. The correct answer would be "Manolo Jimenez." The text states that Sevilla sacked coach Manolo Jimenez, and the club's sporting director Ramon Rodriguez later refers to him as "an excellent professional" who could not get a response out of the team. Juande Ramos is mentioned as the former coach who left the position in October 2007, before Manolo Jimenez took charge.

answer:Question 1: When you apply for a driver's license in a new state, do they check the state you are leaving for arrest warrants before issuing the new license? Answer 1: When you apply for a driver's license in a new state, the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) or its equivalent agency will typically verify your identity and check for any active driving-related issues, such as suspensions or revocations, before issuing a new license. While the DMV is primarily concerned with your driving record, they may also check for outstanding arrest warrants, depending on the state and the specific agency's policies. In most cases, they will access the National Driver Register (NDR), which is a database containing information about drivers with revoked or suspended licenses and serious traffic offenses. If the DMV finds an outstanding warrant, they may deny your license application, and depending on the severity and nature of the offense, may alert the authorities. It is important to note that reporting and sharing between states vary, and it is possible that a warrant from a previous state will not be detected during the application process in the new state. Question 2: If a driver's license is suspended in one state, can you get a new one by moving to a new state? Answer 2: Generally, you cannot obtain a new driver's license in a different state if your license is suspended in your previous state. This is due to agreements under the Driver License Compact (DLC) and the Non-Resident Violator Compact (NRVC), which promote cooperation and information sharing among states regarding traffic offenses and driver's license suspensions. Almost all states in the United States are members of these compacts. When applying for a driver's license in a new state, your information and driving history will be checked through the National Driver Register (NDR), as mentioned earlier. If your driver's license is suspended or revoked in your previous state, it will be flagged in the NDR, and your new state will likely deny your application until your suspension has been resolved and cleared. In conclusion, although both questions involve some form of state-to-state information sharing, the specific procedures and policies related to checking for arrest warrants and issuing a new driver's license may differ. It is important to address any outstanding legal issues and driving suspensions before attempting to obtain a new driver's license in a different state to ensure compliance with interstate agreements and state laws.

answer:The UK government has extended flexible working rights to all employees with over six months' service, with the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills stating that 20 million people now have the right to request flexible working. This change in law is expected to particularly benefit older workers approaching retirement and young workers seeking additional training. Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg emphasized that flexible working boosts productivity, staff morale, and helps businesses retain their top talent, aligning with the needs of modern families. The Chartered Institute of Personnel Development recognizes the growing importance of flexible working for both employees and employers. However, the Federation of Small Businesses has expressed concerns about the additional administrative burden this might place on small businesses and the potential for introducing a negative dynamic in the workplace.

answer:The premise provided offers a perspective on the relationship between miniskirts and traditional female decorum concerning little girls' dresses. It suggests that as miniskirts became associated with adult eroticism, the length of young girls' dresses was intentionally prolonged to maintain a sense of innocence and modesty. In contrast, the hypothesis puts forward the idea that teenagers who feel repressed during their childhoods are more likely to choose miniskirts in rebellion. To determine whether the premise entails the hypothesis, we need to analyze the logical and contextual connection between the two statements. 1. The premise highlights the historical evolution of fashion, specifically the change in skirts' length for young girls and adults. 2. The premise indicates that as miniskirts grew popular in adult fashion and became an erotic symbol, there was a conscious effort to maintain modesty for young girls by lengthening their dresses. 3. The premise does not explicitly discuss the motivations of teenagers who wear miniskirts, nor does it mention that teenagers may have felt repressed during their childhoods. 4. The hypothesis, on the other hand, attempts to establish a causal relationship between feeling repressed in childhood and choosing miniskirts as a form of rebellion during teenage years. The connection between the premise and the hypothesis seems to exist in the context of clothing choices and the possible repercussions of societal norms and expectations. The premise offers insight into the changes in fashion, driven by the need to maintain traditional female decorum in young girls as adult styles took a more provocative turn. On the contrary, the hypothesis digs deeper into the psychological aspect by stating that teenagers who felt repressed in their childhoods choose miniskirts as a form of defiance. It is important to note that the premise focuses on the historical and societal aspects of the fashion evolution, while the hypothesis is concerned with the implications that this evolution might have had on teenagers' fashion choices. In conclusion, the premise does not entail the hypothesis directly, as the premise refers to a more general observation of fashion trends and the societal effort to maintain modesty in children's attire, while the hypothesis proposes a specific causal relationship between childhood repression and teenage rebellion through clothing choice. However, the two statements could serve as starting points for a more extensive discussion on the complex relationship between fashion, societal norms, and personal expression.