answer:(2). it is not possible to tell The statement "Boy with goggles is swimming." provides information about a boy wearing goggles and that he is currently swimming. However, it does not contain any information about the boy's actions before or after swimming. The second statement, "A boy with goggles is sitting by the pool." suggests that the boy is no longer swimming but sitting by the pool. Given the information provided in the first statement only, it is not possible to logically conclude that the second statement is true or false. There could be several scenarios: 1. The boy with goggles finishes swimming and sits by the pool afterward. 2. The boy with goggles hasn't started swimming yet and is sitting by the pool before getting into the water. 3. The boy with goggles never sits by the pool. Because of these possible scenarios, we cannot firmly state that "A boy with goggles is sitting by the pool" must follow, or if it even happened at all, given the information provided in the first statement only. Therefore, the most appropriate answer is: (2) it is not possible to tell.

answer:Andrei Valentinovich Khomutov was born on April 21, 1961, in Yaroslavl, Russian SFSR, Soviet Union. He is a retired Soviet ice hockey right winger. During his career, Khomutov played for: 1. CSKA Moscow (Red Army Team) from 1979 to 1990. 2. HC Fribourg-Gottéron in Switzerland from 1990 to 1998. He was the head coach for Barys Astana of the Kontinental Hockey League (KHL) and the Kazakhstan national team during the 2010-2011 season. Khomutov received the Most Valuable Player award in the Soviet League in 1990 and led the league in goals in 1988. He played for the Soviet national team from 1981 to 1983, 1985 to 1987, and in 1989. He also played for Russia in 1992, 1993, and 1995. His notable achievements include being on the winning side at the following events: 1. 1981 Canada Cup. 2. IIHF World Championships in 1981, 1982, 1983, 1986, 1989, and 1993. 3. Winter Olympics in 1984, 1988, and 1992.

answer:[+] no; The answer is no, because although both questions ask about public transit in two cities in Uzbekistan, the cities are different, and therefore the answers would vary. Namangan and Andizhan are two separate cities with unique public transit systems that would have different strengths, weaknesses, and potential areas for improvement. As a result, each city's public transit system needs to be assessed independently to fully address the specifics of these systems.

answer:Part #1: Choose the most logical word from the given 4 options Usage: In this part, examine each option to determine which one fits best in the context of the statement. Part #2: Replace the <MASK> token in the statement Usage: Once the correct option is determined, place it within the statement where the <MASK> token is, ensuring the statement makes sense and maintains its overall meaning. Example: Statement: "ভাষাগত ও প্রত্নতাত্ত্বিক প্রমাণ উভয়ের ভিত্তিতে অস্ট্রোনেশিয়ান ভ্রমণকারীদের সাথে এটি প্রায় ৩,৫০০ থেকে ৩,০০০ বিপি-তে <MASK> পৌঁছেছিল।" Options: Option A: করাচির Option B: জাভা Option C: পলিনেশিয়ার Option D: মাইক্রোনেশিয়ায় After examining the options and context, Option B: জাভা fits best. Final statement: "ভাষাগত ও প্রত্নতাত্ত্বিক প্রমাণ উভয়ের ভিত্তিতে অস্ট্রোনেশিয়ান ভ্রমণকারীদের সাথে এটি প্রায় ৩,৫০০ থেকে ৩,০০০ বিপি-তে জাভা পৌঁছেছিল।" The word "জাভা" completes the statement and maintains its meaning, talking about the historical evidence of connections between travelers and a specific region.